Amazon.com Widgets
The EID Network & Studios
profound coals of wisdom: " " ~ jeffrey

home home blog contact faq services

8/14/07

Old Man Fred's first post


[Old Man Fred is jeffrey's bitingly mean and irreverent 300 year old alter-ego, and everything irritates him, watch out!]


First off, lemme thank the young punk named jeffrey fer lettin me write on this hear online jurnal thing, and fer settin me up with one of them there computer machines, he got me a fancy steam powered one, an it burns a heap O' coal.

I want you to know that I 'rowed up round 'Ora, Texas, wear folk hear abouts still have sense reckoned to be common, but I reckon its not so common everwear. I also want you to know that I could spit in yer eye as list'n to what you have to say, seein as I'm nigh on 300 hundred years young, and have 40 young-uns. So list to what I haf to say.

Theres a few things hear I wants to say, so I'm just say em and hope they come out alrite.

I watch the radio quite a bit, my favorite is Th' price is rite, but I also like to watch the Newspaper shows, like that whipper-snapper Lary King, but he don't know what hes talkin 'bout nohow.
But Ive done heard some talk bout some play things for young-uns, th' ones made in Cathay, or China, as I heard it called nowadays. There's talk that some of this Chicom junk has lead on it. Now first of all, I'm a thinking a heap of these new fangled play things make young-uns stupid, they don't do no good, or teach nothin worth larnin'. A figure of a man in garb like a spider? I just don't see no use for it. They also got all that garbage that 'sposed to learn young-uns thing like readin ritin, and cipherin. 'Pears to me that young-uns is gittin stupider and stupider, and thems play toys aint helpin none, theys just a hurtin, if you ask me.

My brothers and me.
I kilt the 2 on the left arm wrastlin.

When I was a young-un, bout 2 or 3, my pap gived me my first gun and knife, a 5 ft smoothbore musket-gun, and a 15 inch bowie knife. My brothers and me would git up on that hill yonder and play 'injun (when we wasn't blacksmithing rail road ties with our bare hands), I was alwaysed th' sheriff, and they was alwaysed the pesky redskins. We'd shoot one 'nuther with light loads of bout 120 grains of black powder, and stab at each other real gentle like, not cuttin too deep, If you take my meanin. I only kilt bout 8 of my brothers, but that wasn't nuthin nohow, seein as I had 60 more sibling to spare, so it was just a few less mouths to feed. But I'm goin on a varmit trail, so I'll say what I mean.
It makes me mad as a bear in cayote trap to think on the worthless pansies worryin and a-fussin over dab-blasted lead on them there molly coddle playthins', that don't do nothin but make boys into little girls, which a lot of stupid folks these days says OK. A boy actin like a girl, who ever heard of sich a thing. Its as wrong as all git out. And some of th' boys git older and take to courtin other boys. Why, if I'd a done sich a thing - and I never would of done it - the folks round my place would have strung me up the tallest pine in the woods, and I don't blame em, none!
Really all I got's to say about lead toys is keep the toys out of your young-uns mouths, you no-brained parents. Or even better, quit buyin those stupid playthins' and get johnny a knife and a dead cat, and susie a tea set and skip rope. And stop buyin from the dab-blasted Chinamen, They want to kill you nohow.

There aint nothin wrong with lead, CFC's, or asbestos, matter o' fact, we'd be better off If we replaced those brainless tree-huggers and PETA folk with aerosol cans full of CFC's.

'Bout the zoo known as Warshington, lemme but it this a-way, Will Rogers was nice to them idiots, compared to what I think of 'em. There all rats, all them conrgressers, and they literally make me sick, and my arthritis flares up when e'er I think on em. There all nothin but a bunch of empty suits, who should be held for treason, cept for that there congressmen an that makes em special, for some reason. They don't speak for me nohow.I heard a neighbor onced tell me he thinks we should send every govmnt person there to californy, and sink the whole God-forsaken state, an then elect us some real Men to speak fer us.

If ye wanna deal with them illegals, all you have to do is get a bunch of us refined mountainers lined up on th' border and tetch of them mexicans and terrorists as they dare to cross the line, an after a good while, ye've got a border wall. Simpl as that.

That's my Rulin', and don't worry - ye'll here from me agin, but it time fer me to git to town so I kin play dominoes with my War of Northern Aggresion pals.


-Fred

Labels: , ,

© EID Network

2 Comments:

Anonymous Autumn Rutherford said...

My deepest gratitude to you, Mr. Fred, for speaking the truth about our weak, watery, "free" America! I whole-heartedly agree with you. You should write a book about such. I really think you'd get famous! I know I'd buy whatever you put out there.
By the way, sir, there is a more efficient energy source (for machines) readily available. It is called electricity. You might ask Jeffrey about it. I think it would make your computer work a little faster, with all due respect, sir.

10/27/07 12:01 AM  
Anonymous Old Man Fred said...

*grunt*... a whippersnapper that seems to have 'er head on straight, 'astoundin! jeffrey has hes idears right, for th' most part, but 'es head still ain't on straight, maybe his mum dropped em or somthin...
anyways, thankee kindly for th words ya had fer me.
Yer right, I shud right a book. I think I just might do that...tho jeffrey seys the publisher would die on account of my english. bu what does jeffrey know?
Ill check out 'lectricity, tho ill more thin likly not use, probly too high techno fer me.

10/29/07 6:38 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

5/1/07

Guest Post ; Imus and the First Amendment - Doug Phillips.

This is the best response I have heard/read on the Don Imus issue, written by Mr. Doug Phillips, esq.


Imus has been fired. The world is a better place. There should be little debate when rascals, gossips, and foul-mouthed troublemakers come tumbling down.

And yet there always is debate.

At one level, the debate centers around the theory of some high profile bigots that certain people are allowed to be foul and racially derogatory, while others are not. This notion — all too popular in rap music circles — is nonsense. Those who ridicule and mock others on the basis of their skin color are a plague to civil, Christian discourse — and it does not matter whether such individuals are white, black, green, or polka dot.

At another level, the debate rages over the issue of free speech in the public square. The question: Shouldn’t journalists and shock jocks have the right to speak their mind? How about bloggers, authors, reporters, or even the “tattlers” and “busybody” women of 1 Timothy 5?

It never fails to amaze me how successful the ACLU has been in its efforts; not only has it done its best to convince the Supreme Court of a view of the First Amendment which would have been utterly foreign to the Founders, but it has trained scoundrels, rogues, and criminals of all stripes to invoke the First Amendment in defense of their bad behavior.

Once upon a time, I was a constitutional law student sitting under my professor, Judge Robert Bork. When we studied the free speech clause, Judge Bork would remind us that the constitutional issue is rather simple. The only type of speech protected under the First Amendment is political speech. That is it. Neither libel, nor profanity, nor obscenity, nor vulgarity are protected under the First Amendment.

This applies to radio, to television, to blogs, to newspapers, and even to conversations. It is not unconstitutional to make rules or pass laws which limit non-political speech. This does not mean that such rules or laws are always wise or advisable, but unless they are examples of the federal government restricting political speech, they are not unconstitutional.

But the fact remains — people may not say, write, or communicate to others whatever is on their mind. They may not shout fire in a crowded theater and then claim a First Amendment Free Speech right. Of course, the American law (both common law and statutory) has always recognized this principle. (Note that until well into the 20th century, certain jurisdictions actually made it unlawful to curse or swear in front of women and children.) The narrow focus of the First Amendment is such that some types of speech are not only tortious (thus civilly actionable) but specifically criminal in nature, and thus prosecutable under federal and state law.

The point is this: The American War of Independence was not fought to give people legal sanction to lie, harass, profane, blaspheme, or slander. Nor was it fought to give unscrupulous men the right to be crude on the public airwaves. It was fought to give people the right to hold their government accountable, and to use speech as one means to accomplish this end.

In my view there is a fair amount of hypocrisy surrounding the firing of Imus. People will let shock jocks like Imus rant and rave in the most indelicate, foul, and offensive manner, but if these radio commentators touch on a politically sensitive subject — they are out. My view is this — don’t wait for the politically insensitive subject — kick ‘em out if they are crass, crude, and foul. Period. By this standard Imus should have gotten the boot a long time ago.



I could not agree with Mr. Phillips more.

Labels: ,

© EID Network

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home